During the 1950s and 60s, with Monk, Parker, Gillespie and Coltrane, jazz entered into a sphere that was sometimes difficult for audiences to understand. Like the classical, or as they referred to themselves “serious” composers of the same period dissonance and odd rhythms were everywhere. The difference being that, of course, the jazz musicians were improvising this stuff. I found this quote on a Thelonious Monk website: “You know, anybody can play a composition and use far-out chords and make it sound wrong. It’s making it sound right that’s not easy.”

Typically a piece of jazz from this period will have a composed “head” in beginning, a set piece, which will establish an identifiable key and chord progression, which the music will, mostly, follow. The piece can be identified by it’s head. If a recording is played, beginning somewhere after the head, it may not be evident what the band is playing at all. - Not to me anyway. The head is often repeated at the end.

I have chosen a performance of the Thelonious Monk Quartet filmed in Paris in 1969 Monk is accompanied by Charlie Rouse on tenor saxophone, Nate Hygelund on bass and Paris Wright on drums. The tune is Straight No Chaser. At one time I had an LP of solo piano by Monk of which this was the title tune. Perhaps because of this, Straight No Chaser seems more accessible to me than some of his other works. The “head” is easily recognizable and the improvised section more or less follows a I IV V blues like structure.

[?]
Share This
4 Responses to “Thelonious Monk: Straight No Chaser”
  1. That is a good explanation why when I was a kid, I thought that something was wrong with this type of jazz music.

    I love jazz but sometimes it just seemed to get all weird and lose sense. But I never could pull away completely because I love the sax and that to me is jazz.

    I could listen to a sax being played all day. That is music.

    Kyle

  2. clarkspicks says:

    It turns into a blizzard of notes to my ears. I know that there are no “wrong” notes being played and so the sax player is technically very good, but there is no melody, to my ear. Compare that to Monk’s piano. He’s playing all kinds of weird stuff, but it has a structure and it has feeling.

  3. This is REAL music!

    Remember the R&B album Monk’s kids put out in the 80’s? Wow!

  4. nice info bro

Leave a Reply

Close
E-mail It